Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD E1 您所在的位置:网站首页 amd e1 7010 Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD E1

Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD E1

2024-06-28 14:45| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Home page   ⏵   Processor   ⏵   Comparison Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD E1-7010 Intel Celeron N4500 on Amazon USA AMD E1-7010 on Amazon USA Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron N4500 on one side and the AMD E1-7010 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.8GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:Processor Intel Celeron N4500 AMD E1-7010Market (main)Entry-level notebook NotebookISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)MicroarchitectureTremont Puma+Core nameJasper Lake Carrizo-LFamilyCeleron 4000 E1-6000Part number(s), S-Spec DC8069704609907, SRKH0 EM7010IUJ23JBRelease dateQ1 2021 Q2 2014Lithography10 nm 28 nmCores2 2Threads2 2Base frequency1.1 GHz 1.5 GHzTurbo frequency2.8 GHz -High performance cores2 Cores 2 Threads @ 1.1 / 2.8 GHz 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 1.5 GHzCache memory4 MB 1 MBMax memory capacity16 GB 4 GBMemory typesDDR4-2933, LPDDR4x DDR3-1333Max # of memory channels2 1Max PCIe lanes8 16TDP6 W 10 WGPU integrated graphicsIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16EU) AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics (Beema)GPU cores- 2GPU execution units16 -GPU shading units128 128GPU base clock350 MHz 400 MHzGPU boost clock750 MHz 400 MHzGPU FP32 floating point192 GFLOPS 76.8 GFLOPSSocketBGA1338 FT3b, BGA769Maximum temperature105°C 90°CCrypto engineAES New Instructions AES InstructionsSecurityOS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control Enhanced Virus ProtectionMax display resolution4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI) 4096 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2160@60Hz (eDP) -CPU-Z single thread237 79CPU-Z multi thread486 154Cinebench R15 single thread79 26Cinebench R15 multi-thread174 53PassMark single thread1,402 481PassMark CPU Mark1,955 579(Windows)Geekbench 4 single core2,853 830(Windows)Geekbench 4 multi-core4,681 1,405(Windows)Geekbench 5 single core614 173(Windows)Geekbench 5 multi-core1,071 332(SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance31.3 GFLOPS 8.89 GFLOPS(Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio780 pts / W 141 pts / WAmazon eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron N4500 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron N4500 is lower. The Intel Celeron N4500 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Celeron N4500 237 486 AMD E1-7010 79 154

In single core, the difference is 200%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 216%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Celeron N4500 79 174 AMD E1-7010 26 53

In single core, the difference is 204%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 228%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread Intel Celeron N4500 1,402 1,955 AMD E1-7010 481 579

In single core, the difference is 191%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 238%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Windows:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows Intel Celeron N4500 2,853 4,681 AMD E1-7010 830 1,405

In single core, the difference is 244%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 233%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux Intel Celeron N4500 2,788 4,512 AMD E1-7010 891 1,517

In single core, the difference is 213%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 197%.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android Intel Celeron N4500 2,742 4,620 AMD E1-7010 919 1,539

In single core, the difference is 198%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 200%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows Intel Celeron N4500 614 1,071 AMD E1-7010 173 332

In single core, the difference is 255%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 223%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux Intel Celeron N4500 676 1,262 AMD E1-7010 183 323

In single core, the difference is 269%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 291%.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android Intel Celeron N4500 623 1,170 AMD E1-7010 186 354

In single core, the difference is 235%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 231%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:Intel Celeron N4500 AMD EquivalentAMD E1-7010 Intel Equivalent

See also:Intel Celeron N4505

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.



【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们

今日新闻

    推荐新闻

    专题文章
      CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有